For Pregnant Women Whose Waters Break Early, Watching And Waiting Is Best Management

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Main Category: Pregnancy / Obstetrics
Article Date: 26 Apr 2012 - 0:00 PDT

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions  


Pregnant women whose waters break late in preterm pregnancy but before they are in labor - the medical term for this situation is preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes - are best managed by monitoring and waiting until they deliver spontaneously rather than by inducing labor according to a study by Dutch researchers published in this week's PLoS Medicine.

In their study, David van der Ham, from the Maastricht University Medical Center, Netherlands, and colleagues randomized over 500 pregnant women with preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes between 34-37 weeks gestation to receive either immediate induction of labor or expectant management (monitoring and waiting).

The authors found that there were no real (statistically significant) difference in the number of babies who had a blood infection (neonatal sepsis) or who developed lung difficulties (respiratory distress syndrome) between the two groups. Furthermore, the researchers also found that Cesarean section rates were similar in both groups but that the risk of maternal infection (chorioamnionitis) was slightly reduced in the induction of labor group compared to the expectant management group. These results were consistent with an updated analysis of all relevant studies (meta-analysis), which the authors performed.

The authors say: "We conclude that in pregnancies complicated by [preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes] between 34 and 37 wk of gestation the incidence of neonatal sepsis is low. Neither our trial nor the updated meta-analysis shows that [induction of labor] substantially improves pregnancy outcomes compared with [expectant management]."

The authors continue: "Despite some differences in baseline characteristics, we assume that the results of our study can be generalized to at least the Dutch/Western European population."

However, they add: "Because of wide differences in general health care and availability of antibiotics, it is likely that these results cannot be generalized to low-income countries."

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our pregnancy / obstetrics section for the latest news on this subject. Funding: The trial was funded by ZonMW (The Medical and Health Research Council of The Netherlands) grant number 94507212. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Citation: van der Ham DP, Vijgen SMC, Nijhuis JG, van Beek JJ, Opmeer BC, et al. (2012) Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management in Women with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes between 34 and 37 Weeks: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS Med 9(4): e1001208. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001208
Public Library of Science Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Public Library of Science. "For Pregnant Women Whose Waters Break Early, Watching And Waiting Is Best Management." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 26 Apr. 2012. Web.
1 May. 2012. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.

'For Pregnant Women Whose Waters Break Early, Watching And Waiting Is Best Management'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.

View the original article here